Question:
Chris Horodecki
This guy is whipping some serious a$$. The last fight he had people are calling the best fight the IFL has ever produced. His standup and relentless attack is a testament to his skill, conditioning, and youth. He will be around for a while and it would be cool to see him go against a guy like Faber even though he is a little heavier than him. If they both stand up I think Chris would win but if Faber got him to the ground Chris could be in trouble.
He's good, but he hasn't really fought anybody above his skill level.
big fish in a little pond. Throw him in the UFC and he gets destroyed.
I wanted the other guy to win so bad....That was a great war though, they beat the living piss out of each other.
I say Faber. Horodecki has escaped some narrow decisions and really isn't that dominating.
Faber on the other hand is the exact opposite.
Faber is gonna take it
Also, when you forget the fact that neither of them have seriously been tested, Faber has more skills.
Faber's standup is aggressive and he's great on the ground. good wrestling and decent submissions.
Horodecki is a brawler with an average, at best, ground game
agreed. Faber hasn't really fought tough competition either. But he's a beast when it comes to wrestling. And he has a confidence that can't be matched, which is a very dangerous tool to have. I don't think he'd be able to bulk up enough to make 155 and fight in UFC. People like Sherk, Penn, Fisher are all huge for 155. He'd be fun to watch though.
This guy is whipping some serious a$$. The last fight he had people are calling the best fight the IFL has ever produced. His standup and relentless attack is a testament to his skill, conditioning, and youth. He will be around for a while and it would be cool to see him go against a guy like Faber even though he is a little heavier than him. If they both stand up I think Chris would win but if Faber got him to the ground Chris could be in trouble.
Answer:
He's good, but he hasn't really fought anybody above his skill level.
big fish in a little pond. Throw him in the UFC and he gets destroyed.
Answer:
I wanted the other guy to win so bad....That was a great war though, they beat the living piss out of each other.
Answer:
I say Faber. Horodecki has escaped some narrow decisions and really isn't that dominating.
Faber on the other hand is the exact opposite.
Answer:
Faber is gonna take it
Answer:
Also, when you forget the fact that neither of them have seriously been tested, Faber has more skills.
Faber's standup is aggressive and he's great on the ground. good wrestling and decent submissions.
Horodecki is a brawler with an average, at best, ground game
Answer:
agreed. Faber hasn't really fought tough competition either. But he's a beast when it comes to wrestling. And he has a confidence that can't be matched, which is a very dangerous tool to have. I don't think he'd be able to bulk up enough to make 155 and fight in UFC. People like Sherk, Penn, Fisher are all huge for 155. He'd be fun to watch though.